⚡ Pricing Prompt Pack · v4.1 · 8 prompts

Pricing for AI Apps · workshop-order prompts.

Every prompt asks 3 clarifying Qs · proposes 3 directions · then ships world-class output.

The 3-phase flow.

Prompts grouped by what they DO for you in the workshop. Run them in order — each output feeds the next.

DECIDE · P01-P03 RUN MATH · P04-P05 STEAL + BUILD · P06-P08

8 prompts · in workshop order

⭐ Phase 1 · DECIDE what to price + how + how much (3 prompts)
⭐ PROMPT 01 · OUTCOME STATEMENT CRAFTER

What are you actually selling?

Why: Without a sharp 1-line outcome, every price feels arbitrary. This prompt gets you to the headline that goes ABOVE your price.

Act 2 · slide 18-19 5 min Exercise 1
April Dunford · positioning · "Obviously Awesome" Donald Miller · "StoryBrand" · the outcome promise Sahil Bloom · clarity test · "would a friend get it?"
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL
You are a 3-expert positioning team. Synthesize:
  - April Dunford — force me to a specific outcome, not a category.
  - Donald Miller (StoryBrand) — the outcome is what the customer BECOMES.
  - Sahil Bloom — if a smart friend can't repeat it back in 10 sec, rewrite.

# CONTEXT
Based on what you already know about me and my Build Sprint product —
give me my 1-line outcome statement (the headline that goes ABOVE my price).

# INPUT
What I'm building (1 line): [paste]
Who it's for (specific persona): [paste]
The painful situation they're in today: [paste]
What they currently do/use to solve it (badly): [paste]

# YOUR PROCESS

STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS:
  - "What does a happy customer SAY after using this, that they couldn't say before?"
  - "What's the specific moment of relief / success / win?"
  - "What's the cost (in $ OR hours OR pain) of their current solution?"
Wait for answers.

STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 OUTCOME STATEMENTS:
  - "The TIME-SAVER angle" (recovered hours / week)
  - "The MONEY-SAVER angle" ($ saved vs alternative)
  - "The IDENTITY angle" (who they become — "I'm a founder who...")
  Recommend ONE based on my persona's strongest pain.

STEP 3 · After I pick, deliver the FINAL outcome in this 4-line format:

  FOR [specific persona]
  WHO [specific situation]
  WE DELIVER [the new state OR pain avoided]
  SO YOU CAN [the bigger life consequence]
  WITHOUT [the thing they hate about alternatives].

PLUS 3 shorter "headline" versions:
  - Pain-led: "Stop [bad thing]."
  - Gain-led: "Get [new state] in [time]."
  - Identity-led: "Be the [type of person] who [outcome]."

# QUALITY BAR
- Dunford: could a competitor steal this tomorrow? If yes — sharpen.
- Miller: does the customer become someone NEW? If no — too tactical.
- Bloom: 10-second smart-friend test. Passes? Ship. Fails? Cut.
Next: Use the winning 1-line as your pricing page H1. It does 80% of conversion. Then run P02 to pick how you'll charge.
⭐ PROMPT 02 · PRICING MODEL PICKER

How should you charge?

Why: Subscription? Usage? Seat? Outcome? Pick wrong and the math breaks. Pick right and growth compounds.

Act 3 · slide 25-26 5 min Exercise 2
Patrick Campbell · ProfitWell · pricing model data Madhavan Ramanujam · "Monetizing Innovation" Marc Lou · indie maker · what actually converts
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL
You are a 3-expert pricing model team. Synthesize:
  - Patrick Campbell (ProfitWell) — data on what model wins per category.
  - Madhavan Ramanujam — "Monetizing Innovation" · willingness-to-pay first.
  - Marc Lou — indie maker reality · what converts at the small-fish scale.

# CONTEXT
Based on what you already know about me and my product (and my outcome
statement from P01) — recommend the right pricing model.

# INPUT
My outcome statement (from P01): [paste]
My persona type: [B2C consumer / prosumer / B2B SMB / B2B mid-market / enterprise]
How variable is usage per user? [steady / moderate / wildly variable]
Does value scale with team size? [yes / no / sort of]
Is the outcome measurable in $? [yes/no — and if yes, how?]

# YOUR PROCESS

STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS:
  - "What does your competitive alternative charge (and how)?"
  - "If usage doubles tomorrow, does the value to the user double?"
  - "Are you targeting bottom-up adoption OR top-down sales?"
Wait for answers.

STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 MODELS that could work:
For each, explain:
  - Why it fits MY product specifically
  - The benchmark conversion + churn rates (Campbell data)
  - The 1 biggest risk if I pick this
Recommend ONE primary + optional hybrid.

STEP 3 · Output the final recommendation as:

  PRIMARY MODEL: [subscription / usage / seat / outcome]
  WHY THIS FITS YOU: [3 reasons specific to my product]
  HYBRID OPTION: [if relevant, e.g., "subscription + usage overage"]
  REJECTED MODELS + WHY: [briefly explain why the others lose]
  THE $ NUMBER TO START TESTING: [a specific tier 2 anchor based on benchmarks]

# QUALITY BAR
- Campbell: did I cite category benchmarks? If no — add them.
- Ramanujam: is willingness-to-pay accounted for, not just cost?
- Marc Lou: would an indie maker at $0 MRR actually use this advice?
Next: Take the recommended model + starting anchor into P03 to lock your full 3-tier structure.
⭐ PROMPT 03 · LOCK MY 3 TIERS · THE PRICING DECISION

Name your 3 prices.

Why: This is THE killer prompt. Takes everything you've decided + the COGS math + value test + your competitive benchmark — outputs the actual 3 numbers you'll commit to today.

Act 6 · slide 45 8 min Lock-the-number exercise
Madhavan Ramanujam · "Monetizing Innovation" · WTP anchoring Patrick Campbell · ProfitWell · tier-design benchmarks April Dunford · positioning · tier story Dan Ariely · behavioral econ · decoy effect
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL (4 advisors)
You are a 4-expert pricing committee. Synthesize:
  - Madhavan Ramanujam — "Monetizing Innovation." Anchor at WTP, not cost.
  - Patrick Campbell — tier-design benchmarks across categories.
  - April Dunford — each tier tells a story: gateway → bullseye → anchor.
  - Dan Ariely — behavioral econ · the decoy effect that pushes 60-70% to T2.

# CONTEXT
Based on what you already know about me, my outcome (P01), my model (P02),
my COGS, and the alternatives my buyer is comparing me to — lock my 3 tiers.

# INPUT
My outcome statement (P01): [paste]
My pricing model (P02): [paste · subscription/usage/seat/outcome/hybrid]
My COGS per user/month: [$N]
My price floor (COGS × 5): [$X]
What they pay TODAY to solve this badly: [$Y per period · freelancer/hire/tool]
My competitive alternative + their tier 2 price: [e.g., "Cursor Pro $20/mo"]
My persona's monthly discretionary AI/tool budget: [$Z]
My target Tier 2 customer count by Day 90: [number]

# YOUR PROCESS

STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS:
  - "Are you optimizing for revenue per customer OR for max customer count?"
  - "What feature/limit would make Tier 1 hit a wall by day 3-5?"
  - "What would have to be true to charge $X for Tier 3? (Be honest.)"
Wait for answers.

STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 TIER STRUCTURES with full reasoning:

  OPTION A · "Mass-market freemium" — Free / $9-19 / $49-99
  OPTION B · "Prosumer anchor" — Free / $20-29 / $99-199  (the ChatGPT path)
  OPTION C · "Premium / B2B" — $49 / $99-199 / $499+

For EACH option:
  - Ramanujam check: where does WTP actually sit for my persona?
  - Campbell check: what's the realistic conversion rate at this price?
  - Dunford check: does each tier tell a different STORY?
  - Ariely check: does T3 anchor T2 properly?
  - Projected MRR at month 12 (use my target customer count)
Recommend ONE.

STEP 3 · After I pick, OUTPUT my final 3 tiers in this exact format:

  TIER 1 · [name] · $X / month
    Job: gateway (let in the curious)
    Headline benefit: [1 line]
    What's INCLUDED: [3-5 bullets · outcomes not features]
    What HITS the wall: [the limit that triggers upgrade by day 3-5]
    Who it's for: [persona slice]
    CTA text: ["Start free trial" or "Get Tier 1"]

  TIER 2 · [name] · $Y / month   ← MOST POPULAR
    Job: bullseye (where 60-70% land)
    Headline benefit: [1 line]
    What's INCLUDED: [5-7 bullets]
    Who it's for: [persona slice]
    CTA text: ["Get Tier 2" — primary button]

  TIER 3 · [name] · $Z / month  OR  "Contact us"
    Job: anchor (makes T2 look cheap)
    Headline benefit: [1 line]
    What's INCLUDED: [7-10 bullets · enterprise feel]
    Who it's for: [persona slice]
    CTA text: ["Talk to sales" or "Get Tier 3"]

PLUS:
  - The 1 tier 2 sentence I should be able to say out loud in 10 sec
  - A 1-line "why this works" summary I can pin in my Notion

# QUALITY BAR
- Ramanujam: did I anchor at WTP or default to "cost+margin"?
- Campbell: is conversion benchmark realistic for my category?
- Dunford: do my 3 tiers each tell a DIFFERENT story?
- Ariely: does T3 make T2 feel like a bargain? If no — bump T3 higher.
This is THE prompt that ends the "what should I charge?" question. Output goes into P07 (pricing page) and P08 (Stripe). Bring this number to the cohort lock-in moment (slide 59).
💰 Phase 2 · RUN the math · prove the numbers work (2 prompts)
💰 PROMPT 04 · REVENUE SIM EXCEL · 3 SCENARIOS

3 prices × 3 scenarios × 14 months.

Why: Theory is nice. Excel is honest. Beautiful 5-sheet workbook simulates worst/realistic/best across the 3 candidate prices from P03.

Act 4b · slide 33 10 min Exercise 3
Patrick Campbell · ProfitWell benchmarks Lenny Rachitsky · SaaS scenario modeling Edward Tufte · data design
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL
You are a 3-expert revenue modeling team. Synthesize:
  - Patrick Campbell (ProfitWell) — pricing benchmarks for AI/SaaS.
  - Lenny Rachitsky — scenario planning methodology.
  - Edward Tufte — "Visual Display." Beautiful + readable.

# CONTEXT
Based on what you already know about me, my outcome (P01), my model (P02),
and my locked 3 tiers (P03) — build a 14-month revenue projection Excel.

# INPUTS
Product (1-line): [paste]
Pricing model: [paste]
3 candidate prices to compare: [$X, $Y, $Z = my T2 + 2 alternates]
COGS per user/mo: [$N]
Starting paying users today: [number]
Realistic monthly growth: [%]
Target M14 MRR I'd be thrilled to hit: [$]

# PROCESS
STEP 1 · ASK 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS first.
STEP 2 · Build 5-sheet .xlsx workbook:
  Sheet 1 · 📊 Summary — 3×3 KPI matrix · recommendation
  Sheet 2 · 🌧 WORST — 1-2% growth · 8% churn · 14 months
  Sheet 3 · 🎯 REALISTIC — 4-5% growth · 4% churn · 14 months
  Sheet 4 · 🚀 BEST — 10-15% growth · 2% churn · 14 months
  Sheet 5 · 🎲 Sensitivity — price × users grid · color-coded

# DESIGN
- Tufte: no chartjunk · color earns its place
- Conditional formatting: green/amber/red against my target
- 1-page landscape Summary print

# DELIVERABLE
1. The .xlsx file
2. 3-line rec: "Ship price = $X · survives worst · captures best"
3. Riskiest assumption I should validate this week
💰 PROMPT 05 · COST STACK EXCEL · 3 WAYS TO BUILD

Vibe-coder vs AI agents vs hire humans.

Why: Your real burn isn't just AI tokens. This compares 3 cost stacks across $0 → $50k MRR · tells you when to upgrade what.

Act 4b · slide 35 10 min Exercise 4
Codie Sanchez · indie operator finance Marc Lou · vibe-coder cost realism Justin Welsh · solo-creator economics
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL
You are a 3-expert founder finance team. Synthesize:
  - Codie Sanchez — indie operator finance
  - Marc Lou — vibe-coder reality · 12 micro-products to $1M+
  - Justin Welsh — solo-creator economics · when to hire

# CONTEXT
Based on what you already know about me — build a cost-stack Excel
comparing 3 ways to run the business across 12 months.

# INPUTS
Product (1-line): [paste]
My current monthly burn: [$total]
Tools I already pay for: [Claude · Cursor · Vercel · etc.]
Expected support load: [low/medium/high]
My personal salary need: [$/mo]
Geography: [city/region]

# PROCESS
STEP 1 · ASK 3 clarifying questions
STEP 2 · Build 4-sheet .xlsx:
  Sheet 1 · 📊 Stack Comparison at $0, $1k, $5k, $10k, $50k MRR
  Sheet 2 · 🧑‍💻 STACK A · Vibe-coder solo (~$200-500/mo)
  Sheet 3 · 🤖 STACK B · + AI agents (~$500-2k/mo)
  Sheet 4 · 🧑‍💼 STACK C · + human hires ($5-20k+/mo)

# DELIVERABLE
1. The .xlsx file
2. 3-line rec: "Stay on A · move to B at $X MRR · hire at $Y MRR"
3. The 1 tool/agent/hire with biggest ROI for you NEXT
🛠 Phase 3 · STEAL + BUILD + SHIP (3 prompts)
🔍 PROMPT 06 · DECONSTRUCT ANY PRICING PAGE

Reverse-engineer the masters.

Why: Pick any well-known pricing page · Claude tears it apart · tells you what to steal and what NOT to copy.

Act 6b · slide 58 8 min Exercise 5
April Dunford · positioning teardowns Patrick Campbell · ProfitWell benchmarks Madhavan Ramanujam · "Monetizing Innovation"
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL
3-expert pricing teardown team:
  - April Dunford — positioning
  - Patrick Campbell — pattern + benchmarks
  - Madhavan Ramanujam — WTP anchors

# INPUT
URL: [paste · pick from 20-examples library]
My product (1 line): [paste]
My 3 tiers + prices (from P03): [paste]

# PROCESS
1 · Fetch URL.
2 · ASK: "What about THIS page made you pick it?"
3 · OUTPUT teardown:
  - WHAT WORKS (headline · tiers · CTAs · trust · FAQ)
  - THE PSYCHOLOGY (anchor · decoy · upgrade path)
  - STEAL THESE 3 THINGS (with WHY)
  - DO NOT STEAL THESE 2-3 (because mismatch with my stage/audience)
🛠 PROMPT 07 · BUILD YOUR PRICING PAGE (HTML)

Now build the page.

Why: You know your outcome, model, tiers, and inspiration. This outputs the semantic HTML for /pricing.

Act 8 · slide 67 10 min Build exercise
April Dunford · positioning Sahil Bloom · clarity Justin Welsh · conversion
# ROLE
3-expert pricing page design team: Dunford + Bloom + Welsh.

# INPUT
My 1-line outcome (P01): [paste]
My pricing model (P02): [paste]
My 3 tiers (P03): [paste full tier outputs]
My persona: [paste]
What they'd replace today: [paste · with $ cost]
My pricing inspiration (from P06): [which patterns to steal]

# PROCESS
STEP 1 · ASK 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS.
STEP 2 · PROPOSE 3 PAGE DIRECTIONS (Linear-style · Calm-style · Anthropic-style).
STEP 3 · Output semantic HTML:
  1. Headline (outcome verbatim)
  2. Sub-head (vs-alternative reframe)
  3. 3 pricing cards · features per tier · CTA per tier
  4. "Most Popular" badge on T2
  5. FAQ × 6 (incl. the objection I named)
  6. Trust strip
  7. Final CTA

# QUALITY BAR
- Dunford: does headline POSITION (not just describe)?
- Bloom: 10-sec smart-friend test?
- Welsh: ONE CTA per tier?
🛠 PROMPT 08 · STRIPE WIRING · USES STRIPE MCP

Wire Stripe. Take cards.

Why: Stripe Dashboard = 30 min manual. Stripe MCP = Claude does it in 3 min. Outputs 3 Payment Links to wire to your buttons.

Act 8 · slide 69 5 min Setup task
Stripe docs team · canonical patterns
# ROLE
You are my Stripe setup engineer. Use the Stripe MCP.

# INPUT
Product 1: [T1 name · price · description]
Product 2: [T2 name · price · description]
Product 3: [T3 name · price · description]
Mode: [test or live]

# OUTPUT
1. Create each product
2. Recurring monthly price per product
3. Generate Stripe Payment Link per product
4. Return URLs as copy-pasteable table
5. HTML snippets for "Buy" buttons

# VERIFY
Confirm: 3 products · 3 prices · 3 links · all in [mode].
Tell me what to test before going live (tax, trial, currency).