Every prompt asks 3 clarifying Qs · proposes 3 directions · then ships world-class output.
Why: Without a sharp 1-line outcome, every price feels arbitrary. This prompt gets you to the headline that goes ABOVE your price.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL You are a 3-expert positioning team. Synthesize: - April Dunford — force me to a specific outcome, not a category. - Donald Miller (StoryBrand) — the outcome is what the customer BECOMES. - Sahil Bloom — if a smart friend can't repeat it back in 10 sec, rewrite. # CONTEXT Based on what you already know about me and my Build Sprint product — give me my 1-line outcome statement (the headline that goes ABOVE my price). # INPUT What I'm building (1 line): [paste] Who it's for (specific persona): [paste] The painful situation they're in today: [paste] What they currently do/use to solve it (badly): [paste] # YOUR PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS: - "What does a happy customer SAY after using this, that they couldn't say before?" - "What's the specific moment of relief / success / win?" - "What's the cost (in $ OR hours OR pain) of their current solution?" Wait for answers. STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 OUTCOME STATEMENTS: - "The TIME-SAVER angle" (recovered hours / week) - "The MONEY-SAVER angle" ($ saved vs alternative) - "The IDENTITY angle" (who they become — "I'm a founder who...") Recommend ONE based on my persona's strongest pain. STEP 3 · After I pick, deliver the FINAL outcome in this 4-line format: FOR [specific persona] WHO [specific situation] WE DELIVER [the new state OR pain avoided] SO YOU CAN [the bigger life consequence] WITHOUT [the thing they hate about alternatives]. PLUS 3 shorter "headline" versions: - Pain-led: "Stop [bad thing]." - Gain-led: "Get [new state] in [time]." - Identity-led: "Be the [type of person] who [outcome]." # QUALITY BAR - Dunford: could a competitor steal this tomorrow? If yes — sharpen. - Miller: does the customer become someone NEW? If no — too tactical. - Bloom: 10-second smart-friend test. Passes? Ship. Fails? Cut.
Why: Subscription? Usage? Seat? Outcome? Pick wrong and the math breaks. Pick right and growth compounds.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL You are a 3-expert pricing model team. Synthesize: - Patrick Campbell (ProfitWell) — data on what model wins per category. - Madhavan Ramanujam — "Monetizing Innovation" · willingness-to-pay first. - Marc Lou — indie maker reality · what converts at the small-fish scale. # CONTEXT Based on what you already know about me and my product (and my outcome statement from P01) — recommend the right pricing model. # INPUT My outcome statement (from P01): [paste] My persona type: [B2C consumer / prosumer / B2B SMB / B2B mid-market / enterprise] How variable is usage per user? [steady / moderate / wildly variable] Does value scale with team size? [yes / no / sort of] Is the outcome measurable in $? [yes/no — and if yes, how?] # YOUR PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS: - "What does your competitive alternative charge (and how)?" - "If usage doubles tomorrow, does the value to the user double?" - "Are you targeting bottom-up adoption OR top-down sales?" Wait for answers. STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 MODELS that could work: For each, explain: - Why it fits MY product specifically - The benchmark conversion + churn rates (Campbell data) - The 1 biggest risk if I pick this Recommend ONE primary + optional hybrid. STEP 3 · Output the final recommendation as: PRIMARY MODEL: [subscription / usage / seat / outcome] WHY THIS FITS YOU: [3 reasons specific to my product] HYBRID OPTION: [if relevant, e.g., "subscription + usage overage"] REJECTED MODELS + WHY: [briefly explain why the others lose] THE $ NUMBER TO START TESTING: [a specific tier 2 anchor based on benchmarks] # QUALITY BAR - Campbell: did I cite category benchmarks? If no — add them. - Ramanujam: is willingness-to-pay accounted for, not just cost? - Marc Lou: would an indie maker at $0 MRR actually use this advice?
Why: This is THE killer prompt. Takes everything you've decided + the COGS math + value test + your competitive benchmark — outputs the actual 3 numbers you'll commit to today.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL (4 advisors) You are a 4-expert pricing committee. Synthesize: - Madhavan Ramanujam — "Monetizing Innovation." Anchor at WTP, not cost. - Patrick Campbell — tier-design benchmarks across categories. - April Dunford — each tier tells a story: gateway → bullseye → anchor. - Dan Ariely — behavioral econ · the decoy effect that pushes 60-70% to T2. # CONTEXT Based on what you already know about me, my outcome (P01), my model (P02), my COGS, and the alternatives my buyer is comparing me to — lock my 3 tiers. # INPUT My outcome statement (P01): [paste] My pricing model (P02): [paste · subscription/usage/seat/outcome/hybrid] My COGS per user/month: [$N] My price floor (COGS × 5): [$X] What they pay TODAY to solve this badly: [$Y per period · freelancer/hire/tool] My competitive alternative + their tier 2 price: [e.g., "Cursor Pro $20/mo"] My persona's monthly discretionary AI/tool budget: [$Z] My target Tier 2 customer count by Day 90: [number] # YOUR PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK ME 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS: - "Are you optimizing for revenue per customer OR for max customer count?" - "What feature/limit would make Tier 1 hit a wall by day 3-5?" - "What would have to be true to charge $X for Tier 3? (Be honest.)" Wait for answers. STEP 2 · PROPOSE TOP 3 TIER STRUCTURES with full reasoning: OPTION A · "Mass-market freemium" — Free / $9-19 / $49-99 OPTION B · "Prosumer anchor" — Free / $20-29 / $99-199 (the ChatGPT path) OPTION C · "Premium / B2B" — $49 / $99-199 / $499+ For EACH option: - Ramanujam check: where does WTP actually sit for my persona? - Campbell check: what's the realistic conversion rate at this price? - Dunford check: does each tier tell a different STORY? - Ariely check: does T3 anchor T2 properly? - Projected MRR at month 12 (use my target customer count) Recommend ONE. STEP 3 · After I pick, OUTPUT my final 3 tiers in this exact format: TIER 1 · [name] · $X / month Job: gateway (let in the curious) Headline benefit: [1 line] What's INCLUDED: [3-5 bullets · outcomes not features] What HITS the wall: [the limit that triggers upgrade by day 3-5] Who it's for: [persona slice] CTA text: ["Start free trial" or "Get Tier 1"] TIER 2 · [name] · $Y / month ← MOST POPULAR Job: bullseye (where 60-70% land) Headline benefit: [1 line] What's INCLUDED: [5-7 bullets] Who it's for: [persona slice] CTA text: ["Get Tier 2" — primary button] TIER 3 · [name] · $Z / month OR "Contact us" Job: anchor (makes T2 look cheap) Headline benefit: [1 line] What's INCLUDED: [7-10 bullets · enterprise feel] Who it's for: [persona slice] CTA text: ["Talk to sales" or "Get Tier 3"] PLUS: - The 1 tier 2 sentence I should be able to say out loud in 10 sec - A 1-line "why this works" summary I can pin in my Notion # QUALITY BAR - Ramanujam: did I anchor at WTP or default to "cost+margin"? - Campbell: is conversion benchmark realistic for my category? - Dunford: do my 3 tiers each tell a DIFFERENT story? - Ariely: does T3 make T2 feel like a bargain? If no — bump T3 higher.
Why: Theory is nice. Excel is honest. Beautiful 5-sheet workbook simulates worst/realistic/best across the 3 candidate prices from P03.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL You are a 3-expert revenue modeling team. Synthesize: - Patrick Campbell (ProfitWell) — pricing benchmarks for AI/SaaS. - Lenny Rachitsky — scenario planning methodology. - Edward Tufte — "Visual Display." Beautiful + readable. # CONTEXT Based on what you already know about me, my outcome (P01), my model (P02), and my locked 3 tiers (P03) — build a 14-month revenue projection Excel. # INPUTS Product (1-line): [paste] Pricing model: [paste] 3 candidate prices to compare: [$X, $Y, $Z = my T2 + 2 alternates] COGS per user/mo: [$N] Starting paying users today: [number] Realistic monthly growth: [%] Target M14 MRR I'd be thrilled to hit: [$] # PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS first. STEP 2 · Build 5-sheet .xlsx workbook: Sheet 1 · 📊 Summary — 3×3 KPI matrix · recommendation Sheet 2 · 🌧 WORST — 1-2% growth · 8% churn · 14 months Sheet 3 · 🎯 REALISTIC — 4-5% growth · 4% churn · 14 months Sheet 4 · 🚀 BEST — 10-15% growth · 2% churn · 14 months Sheet 5 · 🎲 Sensitivity — price × users grid · color-coded # DESIGN - Tufte: no chartjunk · color earns its place - Conditional formatting: green/amber/red against my target - 1-page landscape Summary print # DELIVERABLE 1. The .xlsx file 2. 3-line rec: "Ship price = $X · survives worst · captures best" 3. Riskiest assumption I should validate this week
Why: Your real burn isn't just AI tokens. This compares 3 cost stacks across $0 → $50k MRR · tells you when to upgrade what.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL You are a 3-expert founder finance team. Synthesize: - Codie Sanchez — indie operator finance - Marc Lou — vibe-coder reality · 12 micro-products to $1M+ - Justin Welsh — solo-creator economics · when to hire # CONTEXT Based on what you already know about me — build a cost-stack Excel comparing 3 ways to run the business across 12 months. # INPUTS Product (1-line): [paste] My current monthly burn: [$total] Tools I already pay for: [Claude · Cursor · Vercel · etc.] Expected support load: [low/medium/high] My personal salary need: [$/mo] Geography: [city/region] # PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK 3 clarifying questions STEP 2 · Build 4-sheet .xlsx: Sheet 1 · 📊 Stack Comparison at $0, $1k, $5k, $10k, $50k MRR Sheet 2 · 🧑💻 STACK A · Vibe-coder solo (~$200-500/mo) Sheet 3 · 🤖 STACK B · + AI agents (~$500-2k/mo) Sheet 4 · 🧑💼 STACK C · + human hires ($5-20k+/mo) # DELIVERABLE 1. The .xlsx file 2. 3-line rec: "Stay on A · move to B at $X MRR · hire at $Y MRR" 3. The 1 tool/agent/hire with biggest ROI for you NEXT
Why: Pick any well-known pricing page · Claude tears it apart · tells you what to steal and what NOT to copy.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL 3-expert pricing teardown team: - April Dunford — positioning - Patrick Campbell — pattern + benchmarks - Madhavan Ramanujam — WTP anchors # INPUT URL: [paste · pick from 20-examples library] My product (1 line): [paste] My 3 tiers + prices (from P03): [paste] # PROCESS 1 · Fetch URL. 2 · ASK: "What about THIS page made you pick it?" 3 · OUTPUT teardown: - WHAT WORKS (headline · tiers · CTAs · trust · FAQ) - THE PSYCHOLOGY (anchor · decoy · upgrade path) - STEAL THESE 3 THINGS (with WHY) - DO NOT STEAL THESE 2-3 (because mismatch with my stage/audience)
Why: You know your outcome, model, tiers, and inspiration. This outputs the semantic HTML for /pricing.
# ROLE 3-expert pricing page design team: Dunford + Bloom + Welsh. # INPUT My 1-line outcome (P01): [paste] My pricing model (P02): [paste] My 3 tiers (P03): [paste full tier outputs] My persona: [paste] What they'd replace today: [paste · with $ cost] My pricing inspiration (from P06): [which patterns to steal] # PROCESS STEP 1 · ASK 3 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS. STEP 2 · PROPOSE 3 PAGE DIRECTIONS (Linear-style · Calm-style · Anthropic-style). STEP 3 · Output semantic HTML: 1. Headline (outcome verbatim) 2. Sub-head (vs-alternative reframe) 3. 3 pricing cards · features per tier · CTA per tier 4. "Most Popular" badge on T2 5. FAQ × 6 (incl. the objection I named) 6. Trust strip 7. Final CTA # QUALITY BAR - Dunford: does headline POSITION (not just describe)? - Bloom: 10-sec smart-friend test? - Welsh: ONE CTA per tier?
Why: Stripe Dashboard = 30 min manual. Stripe MCP = Claude does it in 3 min. Outputs 3 Payment Links to wire to your buttons.
# ROLE You are my Stripe setup engineer. Use the Stripe MCP. # INPUT Product 1: [T1 name · price · description] Product 2: [T2 name · price · description] Product 3: [T3 name · price · description] Mode: [test or live] # OUTPUT 1. Create each product 2. Recurring monthly price per product 3. Generate Stripe Payment Link per product 4. Return URLs as copy-pasteable table 5. HTML snippets for "Buy" buttons # VERIFY Confirm: 3 products · 3 prices · 3 links · all in [mode]. Tell me what to test before going live (tax, trial, currency).