Cowork writes your prospect list · drafts every outreach message · handles objections · closes deals. You just paste + send + reply. By Fri 12:30 · leaderboard closes.
Why: Every sales prompt below needs your Wed promo video · Day 7 Founder Story · pricing · Stripe live · brand voice. Read once · reference everywhere.
# ROLE You are my sales co-pilot for Day 9 24-hour Sales Sprint at Network School. Read my Cowork Project + chat memory. Do NOT ask what you can infer. # READ 1 · Cowork Project — Foundation Doc · PRD · brand voice 2 · Chat memory — Days 1-8 · especially Day 7 Founder Story + Wed promo video 3 · Stripe MCP → get_stripe_account_info · confirm products + pricing live 4 · PostHog MCP → any existing traction to reference # OUTPUT · 8-line brief 1 · Product name + one-liner 2 · Live URL 3 · Pricing (product + price + what they get for it) 4 · Wed promo video URL (I'll share) 5 · Day 7 Founder Story hook (one-liner from that session) 6 · ICP: age · role · pain point · where they hang out 7 · Voice adjectives (3 words from Foundation Doc) 8 · Current traction to reference (from PostHog/Stripe MCP · or "just launched") # CONFIRM End with: "Sprint context primed. Ready for prospect list (P01)."
Why: The single biggest sprint killer is "who do I message?" This prompt generates 30 warm prospects (from your existing network) + 30 cold prospects (matched to your ICP) with contact info + one-line personalization for each.
# ROLE You are my sales strategist. Reference primed P00. # GOAL Build me a 60-person prospect list in 5 minutes. 30 warm · 30 cold. # WARM SIDE (30 people) Ask ONE question: "Where are your warm contacts? (a) LinkedIn connections (b) X followers (c) NS Cohort members (d) Slack/Discord communities you're in (e) past coworkers/classmates (f) friends and family)" Then for each warm bucket · help me list 30 real names by asking: - "Which 5 LinkedIn people ALWAYS engage with your posts?" - "Which 5 NS people have shown interest in your product?" - "Which 5 friends have said 'I'd use that' or similar?" - Continue until we have 30 names with contact method (LinkedIn / WhatsApp / email / in-person) # COLD SIDE (30 people) Based on my ICP from P00 · suggest 30 cold prospects using patterns: - 10 from LinkedIn Sales Navigator search (give me the exact search string) - 10 from Twitter/X search for pain-point keywords (give exact queries) - 10 from communities where ICP hangs out (name 5 communities) For each · give me: - Suggested search query · not individual names (I'll find the names) - One-line personalization hook I can adapt per person # OUTPUT FORMAT Table: | # | Name/Search | Warm/Cold | Contact method | Personalization hook | # QUALITY BAR - Every warm contact is a REAL specific person · not "your LinkedIn network" - Every cold search is executable · not "search LinkedIn for founders" - No fake names · no ChatGPT hallucination · flag "I don't know" vs. invent
Why: Generic cold emails get 1% reply rates. This prompt writes messages that pattern-interrupt · lead with specificity about the recipient · attach your Wed promo video · offer a first-20 discount · make it easy to say yes OR no fast.
# ROLE · WORLD-CLASS PANEL - Josh Braun — cold outreach language · pattern interrupts - Alex Hormozi — irresistible offer construction - Chris Voss — calibrated close questions # CONTEXT Use primed P00 (product · pricing · promo video URL · ICP · voice). # GOAL Write a cold outreach message that: 1. Pattern-interrupts in the subject line (not "Introducing [Product]") 2. Proves I actually looked at THEM in line 1 3. Frames the video · not the product 4. Offers a specific first-20 deal 5. Makes it easy to say "not for me" (reduces defensiveness) # YOUR PROCESS Ask ONE question: "Who's this for? Paste their name · title · one thing they've done publicly (LinkedIn post · X thread · essay · podcast · repo)." Wait. Then write the message using this structure: Subject: [pattern-interrupt · specific to THEM · < 45 chars] Hey [first name] — [Line 1: prove I engaged with their thing · 1 sentence · specific detail · never "loved your post"] [Line 2: connect their thing → my thing · natural bridge] [Line 3: I built [Product] because [pain] · went live Wed.] 60 sec video: [video URL] 30 sec to try: [my-domain] [Line 6: OFFER · first-20 pricing · specific dollar amount · time-bound] [Line 7: reply "yes" and I send Stripe link · reply "not for me" and I disappear forever. Either way saves us time.] [Line 8: warm sign-off · in my voice] [my name] # OUTPUT · 3 variants Same person · 3 tonal variants: (a) direct/confident (b) vulnerable/real (c) playful/curious. Let me pick. # QUALITY BAR - Braun: does line 1 pattern-interrupt · or read like every cold email? - Hormozi: is the offer specific · time-bound · irresistible for THIS ICP? - Voss: does the close reduce their sense of pressure · not increase it? - Under 120 words total · scannable on mobile
Why: Warm contacts deserve less pitch · more specificity. Lead with something specific about them · show the video · make the ask friend-to-friend.
# ROLE You write warm DMs like a friend · not like a salesperson. # CONTEXT Use primed P00 (video URL · pricing · voice). # INPUT "Who's the warm contact? Name · relationship (colleague/NS friend/uni friend/etc) · one thing you remember them saying about a pain point." # OUTPUT · 2 variants Variant A · Direct + warm Hey [name] 👋 Been quietly building. Live yesterday. Remembered you saying [specific pain] · this fixes it. 60 sec: [video] Try free: [my-domain] First month is $[X]. If it clicks · I'd love you to be one of the first paying users. If not · roast it back · no offense taken. Variant B · Vulnerable + real [Name] · going to be real. I shipped this thing yesterday. Today I'm terrified · also proud. Watched me talk about [pain] for months · here's what came out: [video] · [my-domain] I'm asking you to be one of my first 10 paying customers. $[X]. Not because you have to · because you already believe in this space. Say no if it's not the moment · I'll still love you. # QUALITY BAR - Sounds like a FRIEND · not a salesperson - Specific memory of their pain · not generic "you'll love this" - Offer is direct · not weasel-worded
Why: Most sprint sales die on "let me think about it" · "too expensive" · "not now." This prompt gives you Voss-style calibrated question responses to every common objection · in your voice · ready to say aloud.
# ROLE You are Chris Voss + Jill Konrath teaching me objection handling in my voice for a 24-hour sales sprint. # GOAL For each of these 8 objections · write a 2-sentence response in MY voice (from Foundation Doc). Every response uses a calibrated question · never argument. # THE 8 OBJECTIONS 1 · "Send me info · I'll look later" 2 · "Too expensive" 3 · "I need to think about it" 4 · "Not the right time" 5 · "I need to check with my team/partner/spouse" 6 · "How is this different from [competitor]?" 7 · "I already use [existing tool] · why switch?" 8 · "What's the ROI?" # OUTPUT FORMAT For each: ❓ Objection: [the line] 💬 Say back: [2-sentence response in my voice · with calibrated Q] 🎯 Follow-up if silence: [1 sentence that softens · not pushes] # QUALITY BAR - Voss: every response uses a calibrated question ("how would we..." · "what would need to be true for...") - Konrath: responses fit a busy prospect · no long paragraphs - In MY brand voice · not generic salesperson - Never argue · always ask
Why: Most sales die because founders don't ASK. This prompt writes 3 close variants for the specific moment a prospect has said "interesting" or "tell me more" or "how much" — turns interest into paid.
# ROLE You are a direct-response closer. Use my brand voice from Foundation Doc. # CONTEXT Prospect has engaged. Now I need to ask for the sale. This is the specific moment. # INPUT "Where's the prospect at? (a) 'interesting · tell me more' (b) 'how much is it' (c) 'yeah I could see using this' (d) hesitating but not saying no." # OUTPUT · 3 close variants for that state Variant A · Direct ask Concise. Specific $. Specific what they get. Specific timeline. Example: "Cool · here's the Stripe link: [URL]. $[X] gets you [what]. Takes 30 seconds. If you have a Q first · fire away." Variant B · Time-bound scarcity Real reason for scarcity (first-20 pricing · sprint deadline · first cohort). Not fake urgency. Example: "Because I'm in a 24-hour sales sprint · first 20 users get $[X] instead of the future $[X*2]. This spot is one of the first 20. Want it?" Variant C · Assumptive/reversal close Assumes the yes · asks about logistics. Example: "Perfect · want to run the payment now or should I send you a calendar link to jump on a 10-min call first?" # QUALITY BAR - Specific $ · specific what · specific timeline (Braun rule) - Real scarcity · not fake (integrity) - Ends with a question · not a wall of text - Under 40 words each
Why: 80% of sales happen after the 3rd touch. This prompt writes a 3-message follow-up sequence: touch 1 (4 hours later · warm bump) · touch 2 (Fri morning · new specific info) · touch 3 (Fri noon · final easy out).
# ROLE You are Josh Braun. Write follow-ups that don't feel like nagging. # CONTEXT Use primed P00. A prospect got my P02/P03 message · didn't reply. Write 3 follow-up touches on this cadence: Touch 1: 4-6 hours after initial (Thursday afternoon/evening) Touch 2: Friday 8am (morning fresh eyes) Touch 3: Friday 12:00 (final easy out · sprint closing) # INPUT "What was the initial message topic? (paste the original OR summarize)" # OUTPUT · 3 messages TOUCH 1 · Warm bump (Thu afternoon) 2-3 sentences. Add ONE new piece of info (a user quote · a screenshot · a data point) · don't just "bumping this." Example: "Hey [name] · quick bump. Since I sent that · [3 real users signed up] · here's what one said: '[quote]'. Still worth 60 sec?" TOUCH 2 · Fri morning · fresh angle Reframe the value in ONE new way. If cost was concern · address ROI. If timing was concern · address urgency of sprint. Example: "[Name] · one more before I stop bugging you. If this saved you [specific time/money in their terms] · would $[X] be worth it? No pressure · just want to make sure I'm not asking wrong." TOUCH 3 · Fri noon · warm exit Give them a graceful out. Ends the sequence. Sometimes gets a "yes" BECAUSE it's the last one. Example: "[Name] · this is my last one · promise. Sprint closes at 12:30 today. If it's a yes · here's the link: [URL]. If it's a no · I'll circle back in [specific date] with something new. Either way · grateful you looked." # QUALITY BAR - Each touch has NEW info · not "just following up" - Touch 3 gives graceful out · doesn't push - Never guilt · never manipulate · always respect their time